Dialectic of Baduy Community in Meaning Reality of General Election 2014

Main Article Content

Karman Karman

Abstract

Baduy Community is very obedient to local rules/custom, e.g. lunang (sundanesse to express obedience to whoever the winner), and ngasuh rati, ngayak menak. Surprisingly, the voter number in Baduy have increased from 2013 to 2014. They have their own mechanism in determining leader, that is by deliberation among customary figures. The social-political changes make-up the result of their construction change toward reality. The issue in this study is how Baduy community (re-)construct general election. This one aims to understand Baduy’s  construction to electoral activities, their understanding to the obligation to participate in election, and the adaptation process of different realities (reality in Baduy and Reality in external). By harnessing the Social Construction of Reality introduced by Berger, and Social Adaptation System introduced by Giddens, this research show Baduy objectifies and participates in general elections as an obedience to the customary rules. Understanding about obligations to participate in election is legitimized by customary institution, regarding dualism of different structure, they must adapt theirselves to different realities.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Buku:

Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS), Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), United Nation for Development Programs (UNDP). (2010). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia, Jakarta: BAPPENAS.

Berger L, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. (1967). The Social Contruction of Reality: A Treatise in Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

Craig, Robert T and Heidi L, Muller. (2007). Theorizing Communication: Reading Accross Traditions. London, Thousand Oaks, CA., New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Henn, Matt, Mark Weinstein, and Nick Foard. (2006). A Short Introduction To Social Research. India: Sage Publications, Inc.

Kurnia, Asep dan Ahmad, Sihabudin. (2010). Saatnya Baduy Bicara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Littlejohn, Stephen., dan Karen A, Foss. (2011). Theories of Human Communication, tenth edition. Belmont, California: Thomson Wadsworth.

Moustakas, Clark. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. California : Sage Publication, Inc.

Nimmo, Dan. (1989). Komunikasi Politik Khalayak dan Efek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Patton, Quinn Michael. (2002). Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods, third edition. Thousand Oak: Sage Publication, Inc.

Poole, et.al. (1996). The Structuration of Group Decisions, in Hirokawa and Poole (Eds.), Communication and Group Decision Making, 2nd Edition (pp 114-146). Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Rush, Michael and Phillip Althoff. Sosiologi Politik (alih bahasa Kartini Kartono, 2003). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Saukko, P. (2003). Doing Research in Cultural Studies: An Introduction to Classical and New Methodological Approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

West, Richard dan Lynn Turner. (2007). Introducing Communication Theory, Analysis and Application. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tesis:

Fernandez, Daniel. (2000). Transmisi Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tradisional (Studi Pola Pengasuhan Anak Baduy di Dusun Gajeboh, Desa Kanekes, Kabupaten Lebak, Jawa Barat. Tesis. FISIP UI.

Yulianti, Iis. (2006). Coordinated Management of Meaning Nilai Budaya pada Suku Baduy (Kajian Etnografi Teks Pikukuh Karuhun pada Generasi Muda Suku Baduy di Desa Kanekes). Tesis. Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP UI.

Makalah:

Eberle, Thomas Samuel. A New Paradigm For The Sociology of Knowledge: "The Social Construction of Reality" After 25 Years”. “Schweiz. Z. Soziol./Rev.suisse social. (1992) 493-502.

Hidayat, Dedy N. Paradigma Dan Metodologi Penelitian. (2002, 20-23 Agustus). Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan Riset Komunikasi di Pusat Kajian Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik- Universitas Indonesia Depok.

Internet:

Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2014). Daftar Pemilihan Tetap. Tersedia dalam http://www.kpu.go.id, diakses tanggal 27 Januari 2014.