Subversion Towards Indonesian Government In Discourse Of Democracy

Article Sidebar

PDF (Indonesian) ethical statement (Indonesian) transfer copy right (Indonesian)
Published: Jul 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v19i1.57
Keywords:
subversion, fundamentalist group, construction, democracy
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 1237
Download : 1819
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Karman Karman
Balitbang Kemkominfo

Abstract

Democratization in developing countries gets a challenge from Islamic fundamentalists. ICT provides an important opportunity for the rise of subversion against a democratic government. This article deals with construction of fundamentalists of Islamic groups in Indonesia towards democracy via the Internet. The goal of this study is to know their construction in the discourse of democracy. This research was using the method of discourse analysis with the model introduced by Leeuwen (2008). This research shows that the fundamentalists construct democracy on the basis of theology arguments (i.e.: democracy is a kufr system, idolatry, forbidden, and Islam-based invalid system) and bad effects of democracy. Democracy is a colonization tool of Western countries. It creates accompliceship between the rich and the powerful. Fundamentalists regard democracy as a “religion”. The Indonesian government is represented as “kafir (non-believer)/murtad(apostate)”, “colonialist’s accomplice”, “pharaoh”. Fundamentalist’s internet use becomes a challenge for the government with the subversion discourse emergence.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 19 No. 1 (2016)
Section
Articles

Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Karman Karman, Balitbang Kemkominfo

Peneliti Muda, Badan Litbang SDM Kemkominfo

References

A’la, A. (2008). Genealogi Radikalisme Muslim Nusantara. Akar dan Karakteristik Pemikiran dan Gerakan Kaum Padri dalam Perspektif Hubungan Agama dan Politik Kekuasaan. Surabaya: IAIN Sunan Ampel. [Online]. Available at: http://eprints.uinsby.ac.id/13/1/abd a’la.pdf.

Anney, V. N. V. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: looking at Trustworthiness Criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5 (2), p.272–281. [Online]. Available at: http://jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.com/articles/Ensuring the Quality of the Findings of Qualitative Research NEW.pdf [Accessed: 1 June 2016].

Anon. (2009). Sikap JAT tentang Demokrasi. [Online]. Available at: ansharuttauhid.com [Accessed: 29 December 2014].

Anon. (2011). JAT Siap Hadapi Isu Pembubaran! [Online]. Available at: ansharuttauhid.com [Accessed: 29 December 2014].

Anon. (2014a). ‘Selama Menerapkan Demokrasi-Kapitalisme Liberal Jokowi-JK Tetap Antek Penjajah!’ [Online]. Available at: http://hizbut-tahrir.or.id/2014/10/29/selama-menerapkan-demokrasi-kapitalisme-liberal-jokowi-jk-tetap-antek-penjajah/ [Accessed: 6 January 2015].

Anon. (2014b). Dampak Kerusakan Demokrasi. [Online]. Available at: ansharuttauhid.com [Accessed: 29 December 2014].

Anon. (2014c). HIP Kendal: Harapan Semu Demokrasi. [Online]. Available at: http://hizbut-tahrir.or.id/2014/05/08/hip-kendal-harapan-semu-demokrasi/ [Accessed: 28 December 2014].

Anon. (2014d). HTI Banjarbaru: Demokrasi Sistem Rusak, Menghasilkan Kerusakan. [Online]. Available at: http://hizbut-tahrir.or.id/2014/04/21/hti-banjarbaru-demokrasi-sistem-rusak-menghasilkan-kerusakan/ [Accessed: 27 January 2015].

Anon. (2014e). Pemilu, Sulap Demokrasi Kelabui Rakyat. [Online]. Available at: http://hizbut-tahrir.or.id/2014/04/23/pemilu-sulap-demokrasi-kelabui-rakyat/ [Accessed: 28 December 2014].

Anon. (2014f). Pernyataan Sikap JAT Terhadap Umat Islam Yang Menolak Khilafah Islamiyyah. [Online]. Available at: ansharuttauhid.com [Accessed: 29 December 2014].

Anon. (2014g). Siapakah yang Lebih Baik Din-nya? [Online]. Available at: ansharuttauhid.com [Accessed: 29 December 2014].

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2014). Indonesia Internet Users. [Online]. Available at: http://www.apjii.or.id [Accessed: 28 April 2014].

Ausop, A. Z. (2009). Demokrasi dan Musyawarah Dalam Pandangan Darul Arqam, NII, dan Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 8 (17), p.601–620.

Awwas, I. S. (2011). Melawan Kerakusan Penguasa. p.Situs Resmi Majelis Mujahidin. [Online]. Available at: http://www.majelismujahidin.com/2011/01/melawan-kerakusan-penguasa/ [Accessed: 18 December 2014].

Awwas, I. S. (2014). Tausiyah: Solusi Memilih Pemimpin. p.Situs Resmi Majelis Mujahidin. [Online]. Available at: http://www.majelismujahidin.com/2014/04/tausiyah-solusi-memilih-pemimpin/ [Accessed: 18 December 2014].

Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

Dahlan, M. A. (2012). New Media and Islam: Communication characteristics and Dynamics. Journal Communication Spectrum, 1 (2). [Online]. Available at: http://jurnal.bakrie.ac.id/index.php/Journal_Communication_spectrum/article/view/35.

Dallmayr, F. (2011). Whither democracy? Religion, politics and Islam. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 37 (4), p.437–448. [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1177/0191453710397927.

Diamond, L. (2006). Electoral System and Democracy. Marryland: The John Hopkin.

Dijk, J. Van. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. 2nd ed. London, Thousand Oaks-CA, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

Effendy, B. (2011). Islam dan Negara: Transformasi Gagasan dan Praktik Politik Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Democracy Project Yayasan Abad Demokrasi.

Eriyanto. (2009). Analisis Wacana, Pengantara Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKIS.

Esposito, J. L. (2004). ISLAM: The Straight Path. 3rd Editio. London: University Press, Inc.

Flew, T. (2005). New Media, and Introduction. 2nd editio. UK: Oxford University Press.

Gaffar, A. (1996). Politik Indonesia Menuju Transisi Demokrasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Guba, E. G. (1990). The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing Paradigms In Qualitative Research. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Thousand Oaks-CA, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

Haqqani, H. (2013). Islamists and Democracy: Cautions from Pakistan. Journal of Democracy, 24 (2), The Johns Hopkins University Press, p.5–14. [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1353/jod.2013.0029.

Harto, K. (2008). Islam Fundamentalis di Perguruan Tinggi Umum, Kasus Gerakan Keagamaan Mahasiswa Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Departemen Agama.

Hefner, R. W. (2001). Civil Islam: Islam dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: ISAI.

Heiner, R. (2006). Social Problems: An Introduction To Critical Constructionism. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Huntington, S. P. (1996). Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga (Terj. Asril Marjohan). Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Irwansyah. (2011). Teknologi Komunikasi Sebagai Ekstensi Kekerabatan-Studi Analisis Jaringan Sosial Kekerabatan Berbasis Teknologi Komunikasi Telephone Seluler. Universitas Indonesia.

Javaid, U. (2011). Thriving Fundamentalism and Militancy in Pakistan: An Analytical Overview of their Impact on the Society. South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 26 (1), p.9–18.

Karman. (2015). Konstruksi Nilai-Nilai Demokrasi Kelompok Islam Fundamentalis di Media Online. PEKOMMAS, 18 (3), p.181–190.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2012). Pola Penggunaan Media Digital di Kalangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2013). Komunikasi dan Informatika Buku Putih 2013. Jakarta.

Leeuwen, T. Van. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools For Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Lestari, N. (2014). Wacana Demokrasi dalam Public Sphere Komunikasi Politik di Organisasi Islam Indonesia (Analisis Wacana Demokrasi di HTI, FPI, Muhammadiyah, dan NU). Universitas Indonesia.

Liddle, R. W. (1997). Islam, Politik, dan Modernisme. 1st ed. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Littlejohn, S. W. and Foss, K. A. (2002). Theories of Human Communication. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Littlejohn, S. W. and Foss, K. A. (2011). Theories of Human Communication. 10th ed. Long Grove, lllinois: Waveland Press, Inc.

Marquand, D. and Nettler, R. L. (2000). Religion and Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

Masyarakat Telematika (MASTEL). (2012). ICT Outlook. Jakarta.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. 1st ed. Canada: University of Toronto Press.

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Metzger, M. J. (2009). The Study of Media Effects In The Era of Internet Communication. In: Nabi, R. L. and Oliver, M. B. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects, London, Thousand Oaks-CA, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

Meyer, T. (2002). Demokrasi: Sebuah Pengantar Untuk Penerapan. Jakarta: D’print Communication.

Mirabito, M. M. A. and Morgenstern, B. L. (2004). The New Communications Technologies: Applications, Policy, and Impact. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, Inc.

Muhtadi, B. (2009). The Quest for Hizbut Tahrir in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37 (4), Brill, p.623–645. [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1163/156853109X460219 [Accessed: 8 June 2016].

Mujani, S. (2007). Muslim Demokrat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Muthohirin, N. (2014). Mahasiswa di Pusaran Fundamentalisme Islam, Studi Kasus di Universitas Indonesia. Maarif, Vol. 9, No. 1, 9 (1), p.133.

Nu’ad, I. A. (2005). Fundamentalisme Progresif, Era Baru Dunia Islam. Jakarta: Panta Rei.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Method. London, Thousand Oaks-CA, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Qohar, A. (2011). Arah Gerakan Sosial Kelompok Fundamentalisme Salafi Lampung. Jurnal TAPIs, 7 (13), p.62–77.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies For Ensuring Trustworthiness In Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information, 22 (22), IOS Press, p.63–75.

Suyatno. (2004). Menjelajah Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Liebe Book.

Taher, T. (1998). Radikalisme Agama. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM), IAIN.

Tomasello, T. K., Lee, Y. and Baer, A. P. (2010). ‘New media’ research publication trends and outlets in communication, 1990-2006. New Media & Society, 12 (4), p.531–548. [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1177/1461444809342762.

UNDP and BAPPENAS. (2009). Measuring Democracy In Indonesia 2009 Indonesia Democracy Index. Jakarta.

Widodo, S. A. (2008). Islam dan Demokrasi Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 31 (65).

Zuhri, S. (2011). Revitalisasi Pancasila" dalam Pancasila, Negara Kesejahteraan, dan Ketahanan Masyarakat. Jurnal Dialog Kebijakan Publik.