Formal and Informal Communication Model Activity in the Process of Empowerment
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 3913
Download : 16804
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research development actors are performing on the communication functions. In this study focused on the formal and informal communication, as of opening access, approach on location, design,implementation and evaluation of empowerment program, located in the village of Pasuruhan, Subdistrict Binangun of Cilacap Regency. The purpose of this study was to construct patterns of formal and informal communication in the process of community development activities, especially in the village of Pasuruhan, District Binangun, Cilacap Regency, Central Java Province. The approach was qualitative and the study sample was purposive. Data collection techniques with the Focus Group Discussion (FGD), interviews and observations. Results showed: (1) Formal communication could not be separated from the formal communication in the research process and implementation of empowerment.While formal communication performed after the open access and to reinforce the aim of activity. And then in the implementation of socialization, extension and comparative studies. (2) The failure to informal communication processes, maked the process of qualitative research in particular, could be resistance, minus support, distrust, andcould even rejection of research informants. (3) Formal communication had structured nature, focused and symbolic interaction of status the institution or organizationof communicators. While the informal communication had unstructured nature, dialogical process or more flexible and could be long term, however the discussion wouldbe not focus.
Article Details
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Adi, IR. (2003). Pemberdayaan, Pengembangan Masyarakat Dan Intervensi Komunikasi (Pengantar pada Pemikiran dan Pendekatan Praktis). Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Azis, A. (2008). Memahami Fenomena Sosial Melalui Studi Kasus: Di dalam Bungin, Burhan, editor. Analisis Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Blake RH, Haroldsen EO. (2005). Taksonomi Komunikasi. Bahanan H, penerjemah. Surabaya: Papyrus. Terjemahan dari : A Taxonomy of Concepts is Communication.
Bogdan R, Taylor SJ. (1993). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Afandi AK, penerjemah. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional
Denzin, K. Norman and Linclons. Yvonna (2009). Pendahuluan: Memasuki Bidang Penelitian Kualitatif. Dariyanto et al, penterjemah; Denzin, K. Norman and Linclons. Yvonna, editor. Handbook of Qualitative Research.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Terjemahan dari: Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2000. Thousand Oak, California (US) : Sage Publication
DeVito, JA. (2011). Komunikasi Antarmanusia. Maulana A, penerjemah. Wahyu YI, Prihantini Y, editor. Tangerang Selatan: Karisma Publishing Group.
Dasgupta, S. (2009). Sonagachi Project: A Case-Study Set India. McPhail TL, editor. Development Communication : Reframing The Role of Media. Malden (US), Oxford (GB): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Effendy, Onong Uchjana. (2005). Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Herdiansyah, H. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta : Salemba Humanika
Kriyantono, R. (2006). Tekinik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana.
Lubis, D. (2010). Komunikasi dan Pembangunan. Di dalam : Hubeis AVS, editor. Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi. Bogor : Sains KPM IPB Pr.
Mardikanto, T. (2010). Konsep-Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat : Acuan Bagi Aparat Birokrasi, Akademisi, Praktisi dan Minat/Permerhati Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Surakarta : UNS Press.
Milles MB, Huberman AM. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Penerjemah: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, Jakarta: UI Press.
Mulyana, Deddy. (2005). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Nasution, Z. (2009). Komunikasi Pembangunan: Pengenalan Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pr.
Payne, M. (1997). Modern Social Work Theory. Second Edition, London: McMillan Press Ltd.
Rangkuti, PA. (2011). Komunikasi Pembangunan dan Mekanisasi Pertanian. Bogor: IPB Pers.
Sulistiyani', Ambar' Teguh. (2004). Kemitraan dan Model-Model Pemberdayaan' Yogyakarta: Gaya Media.
Syahyuti. (2006). Tiga Puluh Konsep Penting Dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan dan Pertanian : Penjelasan tentang Konsep, Istilah, Teori, Indikator serta Variabel, Jakarta: PT. Bina Rena Pariwara.
Muchlis, F. (2009). Analisis Komunikasi Partisipatif dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus pada Implementasi Musyawarah dalam PNPM Mandiri Perdesaan di Desa Teluk Kecamatan Pemayung Kabupaten Batang Hari) [Tesis]. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Satriani, I. (2011). Komunikasi Partisipatif pada Program Pos Pemberdayaan Keluarga (Studi Kasus di RW 05 Kelurahan Situgede Kecamatan Bogor Barat Kota Bogor) [Tesis] Mayor Komunikasi Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Suswanto. B. (2011). Model Psikologi Humanistik Pasca Penangkapan Terorisme di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Purwokerto: LPPM Unsoed.