Conversation Analysis Of Indonesia Lawyers Club Talk Show Episode “Negara Paceklik, Perokok Dicekik?”

Article Sidebar

PDF (Indonesian) Ethical Statement Ind Tidak berjudul
Published: Dec 22, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v19i2.122
Keywords:
conversation analysis, ILC, cigarette controversion
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 1632
Download : 5793
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Agus Ganjar Runtiko
Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi - Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Abstract

This study aims is to identifying the structure of conversation and application of cooperative principle as a prerequisite for good conversation in the discussion on Indonesia Lawyers Club (ILC) talk show episode "Negara Paceklik, Perokok Dicekik?" Which aired on August 23, 2016 at TVOne. The data analyzed by using conversation principles as suggested by D. Hymes in the ethnography of speaking, and cooperative principles as suggested by H.P. Grice. This research reveals that as a live broadcast event, ILC talk show episode "Negara Paceklik, Perokok Dicekik?" has form a good structure and meet SPEAKING scheme. However, in terms of the cooperative principle, ILC talk show still needs an evaluation. This study confirms Garfinkel concepts about creativity of human actors, who in the context of ILC conversation are modifying goals, rules, structure and style, also effects of the discussion according to his interests.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016)
Section
Articles

Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Agus Ganjar Runtiko, Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi - Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Agus Ganjar Runtiko adalah associate professor di Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

References

Daeng, S., Hadi, S., Suryono, A., Siregar, D. and Septianti, D. A. (2011). Kriminalisasi Berujung Monopoli. Jakarta: Indonesia Berdikari.

Dewi, C. and Ekalaya, Y. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF OUTER CODE SWITCHING AND CODE MIXING IN INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB. LITERARY CRITICISM, 2 (1), p.49–63. [Online]. Available at: http://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jlc/article/view/218.

DM, A., Ary, H. and Harlan, M. (2011). Membunuh Indonesia. Jakarta: Kata-kata.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantic 3: Speech Arts, New York: Academic Press, p.41–58.

Guyanie, G. El. (2013). Ironi Cukai Tembakau: Carut-marut Hukum & Pelaksanaan Dana Bagi Hasil Cukai Hasil Tembakau di Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia Berdikari.

Jazeri, M. (2008). Realisasi Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Sebuah Interaksi. Diksi, 15 (2), p.149–158.

Kinasih, H. N., Febriani, R. and Sulistyoningsih. (2012). Tembakau, Negara, dan Keserakahan Modal Asing. Jakarta: Indonesia Berdikari.

Pinanjaya, O. and Sasongko, W. G. (2012). Muslihat Kapitalis Global. Jakarta: Indonesia Berdikari.

Radjab, S. (2013). Dampak Pengendalian Tembakau. Jakarta: Serikat Kerakyatan Indonesia & Center for Law and Order Studies.

Rayendra, P. (2016). Bahas Kasus Kopi Maut, Rating Indonesia’s Lawyer Club Tembus Top 15. tabloidbintang.com. [Online]. Available at: http://www.tabloidbintang.com/articles/film-tv-musik/ulasan/32778-bahas-kasus-kopi-maut-rating-indonesias-lawyer-club-tembus-top-15.

Ruisah. (2015). Analisis Percakapan dalam Program Debat Kandidat Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Jawa Timur. Avant Garde, 3 (2), p.218–236.

Scott, J. (2012). Teori Sosial, Masalah-masalah Pokok dalam Sosiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sillars, A. L. (2014). Konflik Interpersonal. In: Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E. and Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (eds.), Handbook Ilmu Komunikasi, Bandung: Nusamedia, p.389–414.

Sobur, A. (2013). Filsafat Komunikasi, Tradisi dan Metode Fenomenologi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suaedi, H. (2013). Analisis Percakapan Dokter dengan Pasien di RSUD Abdoer Rahem Kabupaten Situbondo. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 1 (3), p.274–283.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wacana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Thabrany, H. and Laborahima, Z. (2016). People’s Support on Sin Tax to Finance UHC in Indonesia, 2016. The Indonesian Journal of Health Economics (IJHE), 1 (1), p.1–11. [Online]. Available at: http://cheps.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Jurnal-EKI-Vol-1-No-1.pdf.

Trenholm, S. (2011). Thinking Through Communication. New York: Pearson.

Umarella, F. H. (2005). Etnometodologi: Suatu Penelitian Kualitatif. Communique, 2 (1), p.1–8.

Wiratno, T. (2010). Analisis Percakapan terhadap Drama Kapai-Kapai Karya Arifin C. Noer. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 22 (1), p.117–132.